‘Sitaare Zameen Par’ (2025) Movie Review – R.S. Prasanna’s Underwhelming Remake

‘Sitaare Zameen Par’ (2025) Movie Review – R.S. Prasanna’s Underwhelming Remake

Javier Fesser’s Champions/Campeones is a kind of motion pictures that may very well be made right into a terrific Bollywood movie. It has the correct quantity of drama {that a} gifted Hindi filmmaker can flip right into a coronary heart-warming melodrama. After watching that Spanish comedy-drama, all I might fantasize about was how higher the fabric would look within the arms of a Bollywood filmmaker. Champions has an enormous coronary heart and large feelings – it nearly cries out for a Grand Indian Adaptation. Then once more, I might need overestimated our filmmakers. It is not that they don’t seem to be gifted. The issue is that everyone these days is busy pleasing and predicting the style of an viewers that does not demand a lot from motion pictures or moviemakers. For this reason a Reema Kagti makes Superboys of Malegaon, and a Vikramaditya Motwane offers us CTRL and Black Warrant. In different phrases, filmmakers who as soon as impressed us with their greatness now attempt to tone down their work in order that their motion pictures or TV reveals could be simply digested by the mass viewers. Solely Anurag Kashyap has not but yielded to the calls for of content material customers—and he paid the value with Nearly Pyaar with DJ Mohabbat, which was a sufferer of each obtuse opinions and poor field workplace efficiency. 

Earlier than Sitaare Zameen Par, R.S. Prasanna directed Shubh Mangal Saavdhan, a remake of his personal Tamil movie, Kalyana Samayal Saadham. I’ve not seen the 2013 movie, however based mostly on his remakes, one can label him as a humorous, type-hearted filmmaker. Even in interviews, one can discover a glow on his face. He appears content material. Prasanna has mentioned that he’s very affected person and that he makes a film provided that he trusts within the materials. There are lengthy gaps in his quick filmography, and after watching Sitaare Zameen Par, one needs that he had taken an extended break earlier than totally committing to this mission. The principle drawback with SZP is that it appears to have been conceived with ethical classes. In Champions, Fesser first noticed his characters and their motivations earlier than normalizing or spreading consciousness about intellectually disabled people. SZP, written by Divy Nidhi Sharma, first teaches after which tries to go close to its characters. Therefore, you get a scene the place Gulshan (Aamir Khan) asks direct questions relating to mental disabilities, and Kartar Paaji (Gurpal Singh) solutions like a scripted mouthpiece in a authorities-sponsored commercial. You’ll be able to nearly see the filmmakers writing all of the related information on a whiteboard. Was this PSA-like high quality current from the start or added later after Khan’s involvement? Champions would not make blatant makes an attempt at educating the viewers – the method is extra natural there. Right here, one feels as if Prasanna and his group are certain by some ethical obligation to ship us away with pamphlets. This implies they repeatedly emphasize easy factors, which is why a line associated to “regular habits” pops up often, each as a joke and a reminder.

Talking of jokes, Gulshan asks Satbir (Aroush Datta) to make use of the phrase “businesswoman” as a substitute of “prostitute.” 5 seconds later, somebody asks Gulshan what his spouse does, and he replies that she’s a businesswoman. When Kartar, after explaining that everyone has their very own regular, asks Gulshan how a lot sugar he desires, the brand new coach says, “Regular.” This enables Satbir to mischievously inquire, “Aapka regular ya mera?” What this means about SZP is that it is in a rush to show how witty it’s; the setups are instantly adopted by the payoffs. The film asks for a pat on the again, but it surely unintentionally exposes itself as one thing that goes for straightforward humor. When Gulshan orders his group to seize the balls, they…let’s simply say they do not seize the basketball. Ribald humor could be its personal reward. In Champions, one of many gamers develops a crush on Athenea Mata’s character (he stares at her bosom). SZP, sadly, would not actually decide to this line of amusement. It even sanitizes that “crush angle.” This itself is just not a matter of grave concern, however the problem lies within the tweaks SZP does to the unique jokes: It renders the unpredictable predictable. Think about the scene in Champions the place Marco encounters his mom in a lodge. He comes out of his room, locks the door, and we see a hazy determine within the background. This out-of-focus character is revealed to be the mom, and it comes as a real shock, eliciting laughter. In SZP, Gulshan stands close to the elevator on the left aspect of the display screen, and the suitable aspect is left empty for the mom’s look. The scene is conventionally deliberate, so the result feels predictable. There is no such thing as a room for surprises right here. 

Within the title of efficiency, Khan’s face alternates between a smile and a scowl. He typically scratches his head in embarrassment, like a toddler who has been caught masturbating by his dad and mom. The purpose, in fact, is to point out his character as a naive child who’s compelled to confront his weak point, however Khan is so fussy that it appears as if the actor is solely proving why he is known as Mr. Perfectionist by his followers, journalists, and different filmmakers. In a single scene, Sunita (Genelia Deshmukh), Gulshan’s spouse, complains that Gulshan has a foul behavior of not taking different viewpoints into consideration. The identical criticism could be prolonged to the movie itself. SZP is locked into Gulshan’s perspective; different characters exist to simply wake him up. Sunita apparently needed to be an actor. She gave up on her profession after getting married to Gulshan. However he by no means requested her to sacrifice her skilled life. Furthermore, many actors proceed to work after marriage and sometimes discover nice success. Some actors take a break from motion pictures after they get pregnant. Sunita did not even need to face this drawback, given Gulshan has little interest in turning into a father. It is she who forces him to turn into a dad. In different phrases, she appears accountable for killing her personal desires, her personal profession. SZP by no means counters this notion as a result of Sunita is rarely allowed to debate her motives or experiences. This might have been a unbelievable alternative for Deshmukh to take cues from her private insights and incidents to provide her character extra dimensions (she’s married in actual life and will have drawn from her experiences to inform us why precisely a married girl would discover it difficult to work in movies even when the husband has no drawback along with her occupation). Nonetheless, Prasanna is so enamored of the person—the celebrity—on the middle that he both fails to see this chance or has no concept he might have fused actuality with fiction. 

SZP treats intellectually disabled characters as mere stepping stones who elevate and broaden Gulshan’s consciousness and intelligence. One in every of them lives along with his roommates, however we do not see what actions he does with them or what each events have discovered from one another. Lotus (Aayush Bhansali) has a girlfriend, but we by no means see them engaged in dialog or hanging out collectively. The “sitaare” are left clean (a problem the remake borrows from the unique), however they’re additionally the only cause to go to the movie show. What’s extra, Prasanna dips SZP in loads of sugar. It is a candy movie and really watchable, although the sweetness turns you off simply earlier than the interval when a frog re-enters the body and dances together with the characters. The second seems so synthetic that it throws you off steadiness. There are too many “tingu” jokes, and they don’t seem to be humorous even as soon as. At one level, SZP shifts from genetic faults to an previous couple romance. The filmmakers might need been considering, “Hey, why cease at one matter when you possibly can educate the viewers about one other factor as effectively.” In some shared cinematic universe, Gautam and Raman (from Stolen) may very well be congratulating Gulshan (and vice versa). Once more, issues might have been higher if SZP had ever taken into consideration Preeto’s (Dolly Ahluwalia) perspective. What does she like about Daulat ji (Brijendra Kala)? What do they speak about in non-public, away from Gulshan’s ears? Earlier than Preeto leaves for an “ashram,” Gulshan unexpectedly offers her a hug. Does she focus on this incident along with her lover? Prasanna’s silence accentuates his nearly slavish devotion to the supply materials. Just like the movie, he’s crammed with sweetness. The essential components which might be lacking from each the movie and the filmmaker are an ardent curiosity and fervid creativeness. 

Champions is at present not accessible to stream on any platform in India. That is a pity as a result of it makes for a vital viewing, particularly when positioned alongside Prasanna’s effort. Watch Fesser’s sports activities comedy earlier than or after SZP, and you’ll notice how far Bollywood has fallen in an space the place it as soon as was a…champion. Fesser does all the pieces higher. The climax of each movies is nearly the identical; but, the spirit – the message – of that ending involves the foreground extra powerfully within the unique. Right here, all of the heavy underlining works towards the fabric’s energy. What’s (inadvertently) humorous is that even after highlighting every line, every pause, every expression, Gulshan is required to sum up no matter he has discovered and the way he has modified in the course of the last moments (in Champions, we grasp all this data, which Fesser would not spoon-feed the viewers). I suppose the principle cause why SZP did not work for me very effectively is that Prasanna overly dramatizes a narrative that is already filled with a enough quantity of feelings. I like remakes that carry one thing new to the desk. Nonetheless, the modifications applied right here show detrimental to the general expertise. It could have been good if Prasanna had simply copied Champions body by body.  

Last Rating- [4.5/10]
Reviewed by – Vikas Yadav
Comply with @vikasonorous on Twitter
Writer at Midgard Instances